Who is Israel and what does it want to be? How a Constitution would lead to solutions.

Strategic Reality: Constitutional Vacuum Creates Space for Recurring Crisis

Published:

Israel faces a fundamental strategic challenge that has nothing to do with external threats and everything to do with internal institutional incompleteness. After 75 years, Israel remains constitutionally unfinished - a functional state that has never defined what kind of country it intends to be.

This constitutional vacuum creates cascading policy failures across every strategic domain. Settlement expansion proceeds without territorial strategy. Judicial reform triggers constitutional crisis. Palestinian governance remains reactive rather than systematic. Each issue becomes an existential battle because no foundational framework exists for resolution.

Israel’s current challenges are symptoms of constitutional incompleteness, not standalone problems requiring separate solutions.

Historical Precedent: America’s Constitutional Crisis

The United States faced identical dynamics between 1787 and 1865. The Constitution created functional government while deliberately avoiding fundamental questions about slavery, federal authority, citizenship rights, and territorial expansion. The founders knew these issues were irreconcilable at the time, so they established working institutions while punting on identity questions.

This constitutional ambiguity created 80 years of escalating crisis. The Missouri Compromise (1820), Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854), and Dred Scott decision (1857) were all attempts to manage symptoms of constitutional incompleteness. Each “solution” created new problems because the fundamental question remained unanswered: What kind of country is America?

Lincoln recognized that constitutional ambiguity made stable governance impossible. “A house divided against itself cannot stand” was strategic analysis, not moral rhetoric. The Civil War forced constitutional completion through the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, which finally defined citizenship, federal authority, and individual rights.

America emerged as a different kind of country - not just the same country with slavery banned, but a constitutionally redefined nation with clear institutional frameworks for governance.

Important caveat: America’s constitutional crisis involved a clear moral contradiction (slavery) that ultimately permitted decisive resolution. Israel’s challenge - balancing Jewish national character with democratic governance - represents a more complex tension without obvious constitutional answers. However, the core insight remains: constitutional ambiguity makes stable long-term governance extremely difficult regardless of the specific tensions involved.

Israel’s Constitutional Incompleteness

Israel’s founding documents established Jewish statehood and democratic governance without defining the relationship between these concepts. The Declaration of Independence promised equality regardless of religion while asserting Jewish national character. No constitution exists to reconcile these commitments or define their practical implementation.

Undefined Relationships:

Constitutional Vacuum Consequences: Without foundational answers, every policy becomes ad hoc crisis management. Settlement expansion occurs without strategic framework. Palestinian governance remains reactive. Religious-secular conflicts trigger constitutional crises. Regional relationships lack institutional foundation.

The 2023 judicial reform conflict revealed complete disagreement about governance structure among Israeli institutions themselves. This wasn’t policy dispute - it was constitutional crisis about what kind of government Israel has.

Strategic Costs of Constitutional Ambiguity

Domestic Instability: Every major policy decision triggers existential debate because no constitutional framework exists for resolution. Religious-secular conflicts, territorial policy, citizenship rights - all become constitutional crises rather than policy discussions.

Regional Relationships: Arab states cannot normalize with institutional ambiguity. They need to know what kind of country they’re recognizing and what that relationship entails long-term. Constitutional uncertainty makes strategic partnerships impossible.

Alliance Management: Democratic partners require constitutional clarity for sustained cooperation. The United States justifies Israeli partnership through shared democratic values, but constitutional vacuum makes this relationship vulnerable to political change.

Policy Effectiveness: Without constitutional foundation, Israeli policy becomes reactive rather than strategic. Palestinian governance, settlement expansion, judicial authority - all proceed without institutional framework, creating endless conflict rather than sustainable solutions.

The Palestinian Question as Constitutional Symptom

Current Palestinian policy chaos reflects constitutional incompleteness rather than external complexity alone. Israel cannot establish coherent governance frameworks for Palestinians because it has never clearly defined governance frameworks for itself.

Fundamental Questions Requiring Constitutional Answers:

Constitutional Clarity Enables Strategic Planning: You cannot design sustainable governance arrangements for Palestinians within institutional frameworks that don’t exist. Current approaches lack coherence because they attempt to solve territorial problems without addressing constitutional foundations.

Settlement expansion proceeds without strategic vision because no constitutional framework defines territorial governance principles. Palestinian administrative arrangements remain temporary because no constitutional structure exists for permanent minority rights protection.

Important Limitation: Constitutional clarity would provide Israel with institutional frameworks for more coherent Palestinian governance, but would not necessarily address Palestinian national aspirations or resolve identity-based political tensions. Many constitutional democracies successfully manage ethnic diversity while maintaining some level of ongoing political tension between communities.

Constitutional Options: Multiple Frameworks Available

Israel must choose among legitimate constitutional models rather than continuing institutional ambiguity:

Ethnic Democracy Model: Constitutional recognition of Jewish national character with guaranteed minority rights protection, similar to Ireland’s constitutional Catholicism with Protestant protection.

Multicultural Federation: Constitutional framework recognizing multiple national communities with autonomous governance, similar to Canada’s Quebec arrangements or Belgium’s linguistic communities.

Liberal Democracy: Constitutional separation of ethnic identity from governance structure, with cultural protection through individual rather than group rights, similar to France’s secular republic model.

Consociational Democracy: Constitutional power-sharing arrangements between ethnic communities, similar to Northern Ireland’s Good Friday Agreement or Lebanon’s confessional system.

Each model has advantages and disadvantages, but constitutional clarity enables strategic planning regardless of which framework Israel chooses.

Economic Efficiency: Constitutional Foundations for Competitive Advantage

Constitutional completion offers significant economic benefits beyond governance improvement. Israel’s current institutional ambiguity creates systematic inefficiencies that undermine competitive position, while constitutional clarity enables economic frameworks that drive national competitiveness.

Current Rent-Seeking Structures

Coalition Politics as Resource Distribution System: Israel’s coalition government operates as a rent distribution mechanism rather than policy optimization framework. Parties demand ministerial positions for patronage access rather than administrative competence. Religious parties trade political support for exemptions, funding, and parallel institutional development. Settlement movement expansion receives resources through coalition politics rather than strategic economic analysis.

Bureaucratic Overlap Without Constitutional Boundaries: Multiple agencies exercise overlapping authority without clear jurisdictional limits. Regulatory capture occurs when industries shape regulations without constitutional constraint mechanisms. Security spending inflates through political rather than strategic logic. Parallel religious, secular, and Arab institutional systems create administrative redundancy and resource waste.

Measurable Competitive Disadvantages: Israel ranks approximately 35th globally in World Bank Ease of Doing Business indicators, below constitutional democracies with clearer institutional frameworks. Regulatory quality scores remain lower than peer democracies due to policy uncertainty and regulatory inconsistency created by coalition system dynamics.

Constitutional Mechanisms for Economic Efficiency

Institutional Separation Preventing Capture: Constitutional separation of powers creates independent regulatory authority preventing political interference in economic policy. Judicial review enables courts to enforce constitutional limits on rent distribution. Clear government scope definition through constitutional boundaries constrains arbitrary market intervention. Constitutional accountability mechanisms require transparency and performance measurement in resource allocation.

Market Competition Protection: Constitutional commerce provisions prevent regional or sectoral protectionism that reduces economic efficiency. Market access rights provide constitutional protection for business formation and competitive processes. Property rights frameworks reduce regulatory uncertainty through clear constitutional guidelines. Rule of law provisions constrain arbitrary government intervention in economic relationships.

Administrative Efficiency Through Clarity: Constitutional jurisdictional boundaries prevent overlap and bureaucratic turf battles that waste resources. Budget processes with constitutional frameworks enable priority setting and rational resource allocation. Civil service systems with constitutional protection allow merit-based rather than political appointment. Constitutional decentralization reduces central bureaucratic control while enabling local efficiency.

International Evidence: Constitutional Efficiency Gains

United States (1787-1800): Constitutional commerce clause eliminated state trade barriers and created unified national market. Federal structure reduced rent-seeking through jurisdictional competition between states. Property rights protection enabled investment and innovation. Result: massive economic growth through institutional efficiency.

Germany (1949-1990): Federal competition allows states to compete for business through efficiency rather than political rent-seeking. Constitutional court limits government scope and prevents systematic regulatory capture. Economic freedom provisions create constitutional social market economy framework. Result: European economic leadership through institutional quality.

Constitutional Framework for Israeli Competitive Advantage

Economic Governance Clarity: Constitutional central bank independence prevents political interference in monetary policy. Competition authority receives constitutional framework for antitrust and market regulation. Infrastructure investment follows constitutional criteria for economic efficiency rather than political allocation. Education system operates under constitutional framework reducing parallel system inefficiencies.

Regulatory Efficiency Standards: Constitutional requirements for consolidated regulatory approval through one-stop permitting processes. Sunset clauses require constitutional review and elimination of unnecessary regulations. Performance measurement becomes constitutional accountability requirement for government efficiency. Judicial review enables constitutional court enforcement of economic efficiency standards.

Business Environment Enhancement: Constitutional stability attracts foreign investment through regulatory predictability. Economic bill of rights provides constitutional protection for property, contracts, and competition. Government scope limitations through constitutional constraints prevent arbitrary market intervention. Fiscal responsibility provisions establish constitutional balanced budget and debt limit frameworks.

Implementation Strategy: Business Community Engagement

Constitutional completion provides measurable economic benefits that appeal directly to business community interests. Cost-benefit analysis demonstrates competitive advantages of constitutional efficiency compared to current institutional ambiguity. International comparisons show superior economic performance of constitutional democracies with clear institutional frameworks.

Business community coalition building around constitutional convention creates powerful implementation momentum. Constitutional stability becomes a factor in foreign investment decisions and technology transfer agreements. Regulatory reform through constitutional process enables comprehensive business environment improvement rather than piecemeal administrative changes.

Implementation Process: Constitutional Convention

Historical Precedent: America’s 1787 Constitutional Convention replaced dysfunctional Articles of Confederation with working constitutional framework. Israel’s Basic Laws function like Articles of Confederation - adequate for basic governance but insufficient for fundamental questions.

Constitutional Momentum Development: Constitutional conventions typically occur following institutional crises that demonstrate the inadequacy of existing frameworks. The 2023 judicial reform crisis revealed complete disagreement about governance structure among Israeli institutions themselves - exactly the type of constitutional emergency that historically triggers foundational reform processes.

Israeli Constitutional Process:

  1. Constitutional Convention: Representatives from across Israeli society drafting fundamental governance framework
  2. Public Debate: Extended discussion period enabling democratic participation in constitutional design
  3. Referendum Process: Popular vote on constitutional framework ensuring democratic legitimacy
  4. Implementation Timeline: Structured transition from Basic Laws to constitutional governance

Implementation Realism: The same political forces that have prevented constitutional completion may resist constitutional convention. However, recurring institutional crises create windows where constitutional solutions become more attractive than continued chaos. Crisis-driven constitutional moments offer opportunities for breakthrough that normal political periods do not provide.

Stakeholder Inclusion: Constitutional process must include all Israeli citizens - Jewish and Arab, religious and secular, immigrant and native-born. Constitutional legitimacy requires broad participation in foundational design, even if perfect consensus remains impossible.

Strategic Benefits of Constitutional Completion

Economic Competitiveness: Constitutional frameworks eliminate rent-seeking inefficiencies and bureaucratic overlap that currently undermine Israel’s competitive position. Clear institutional boundaries enable regulatory efficiency, market development, and investment attraction that drive economic growth and international competitiveness.

Policy Clarity: Constitutional framework enables strategic rather than reactive policy. Palestinian governance, settlement planning, religious-secular relations, regional partnerships - all benefit from institutional foundation that provides guidance for long-term planning rather than crisis management.

Political Stability: Constitutional rules reduce existential conflict by establishing legitimate processes for policy dispute resolution. Supreme Court authority, Knesset powers, citizenship rights - all defined rather than contested, though political disagreements will continue within established frameworks.

Regional Legitimacy: Arab states can more easily normalize with constitutional democracy rather than institutional ambiguity. Clear governance framework enables strategic partnerships and economic cooperation, though political tensions may persist.

Alliance Strength: Democratic partners gain constitutional foundation for sustained cooperation. American-Israeli partnership becomes institutionally grounded rather than politically vulnerable, though policy disagreements will continue.

International Standing: Constitutional completion demonstrates institutional maturity and democratic development, enhancing Israel’s global position and diplomatic effectiveness while not eliminating all international criticism.

Implementation Timing: Current Opportunity

Regional circumstances provide optimal constitutional convention timing. Iranian strategic reorientation reduces external pressure. Chinese-Russian crisis diverts great power attention. Arab states prioritize economic development over Palestinian issues.

This window enables internal constitutional process without external interference or crisis management requirements. Constitutional completion during regional stability creates foundation for strategic engagement as circumstances change.

Constitutional delay increases costs: Every year without constitutional foundation creates additional institutional conflicts and policy failures. Early implementation prevents crisis escalation while regional conditions remain favorable.

Conclusion: Constitutional Completion as Strategic and Economic Imperative

Israel’s choice is not whether to complete its constitutional founding, but when and how. Current institutional ambiguity creates recurring crisis and prevents strategic planning across all policy domains while systematically undermining economic competitiveness through rent-seeking and bureaucratic inefficiency.

Constitutional completion enables Israel to establish clearer frameworks for governance - democratic, Jewish, economically efficient, and strategically coherent. Without constitutional foundation, Israel remains trapped in crisis management and competitive disadvantage regardless of external circumstances.

The economic benefits alone justify constitutional completion: elimination of rent-seeking structures, regulatory efficiency, investment attraction, and competitive advantage through institutional quality. These measurable benefits provide concrete returns on constitutional investment beyond abstract governance improvements.

The Palestinian question, judicial reform conflicts, religious-secular tensions, and regional relationships all would benefit from constitutional frameworks rather than ad hoc policy responses. Constitutional clarity provides institutional foundation for addressing these challenges sustainably, though it cannot eliminate all underlying tensions.

Historical precedent demonstrates that constitutional completion transforms both governance capacity and economic performance rather than merely reforming existing policies. America became a different kind of nation through constitutional redefinition, achieving both political stability and economic dynamism.

Israel can achieve similar institutional transformation through constitutional development - defining what kind of country it wants to be and building institutions to sustain that vision across generations while enabling economic competitiveness in global markets.

The alternative is recurring institutional crisis and systematic competitive disadvantage regardless of tactical policy successes. Constitutional incompleteness makes both strategic coherence and economic efficiency extremely difficult no matter how effective short-term crisis management becomes.

Implementation should begin during favorable regional conditions before constitutional vacuum creates additional institutional damage and competitive disadvantage.

This analysis focuses on Israeli institutional requirements and strategic benefits rather than external expectations or international compliance. Constitutional completion serves Israeli interests regardless of foreign approval or disapproval.

— Free to share, translate, use with attribution: D.T. Frankly (dtfrankly.com)

§